<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words reveal where change will remain the same</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theranchosantafenews.com/2009/01/%3cstrong%3ewords-reveal-where-change-will-remain-the-same%3cstrong%3e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theranchosantafenews.com/2009/01/%3cstrong%3ewords-reveal-where-change-will-remain-the-same%3cstrong%3e/</link>
	<description>Making Waves in your Neighborhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://theranchosantafenews.com/2009/01/%3cstrong%3ewords-reveal-where-change-will-remain-the-same%3cstrong%3e/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ranchosfnews.com/?p=46356#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Is there anything you are not against? You need to get your stories straight. Here is a direct quote from your June 27, 2008 article entitled &#039;John McCain a relic from last century&#039;. &quot;Solar, wind and wave are energies of California’s future&quot;. How can you criticize Obama for touting “harnessing the sun, winds, and the soil,” two of those very same things you advocated 8 months ago? And if in fact &quot;Solar, wind and wave are energies of California’s future&quot;, how on earth can that be as bad as fossil fuels and nuclear energy? It isn&#039;t. You have either forgotten your stance or this is just bad journalism. Not very &quot;enlightening&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything you are not against? You need to get your stories straight. Here is a direct quote from your June 27, 2008 article entitled &#8216;John McCain a relic from last century&#8217;. &#8220;Solar, wind and wave are energies of California’s future&#8221;. How can you criticize Obama for touting “harnessing the sun, winds, and the soil,” two of those very same things you advocated 8 months ago? And if in fact &#8220;Solar, wind and wave are energies of California’s future&#8221;, how on earth can that be as bad as fossil fuels and nuclear energy? It isn&#8217;t. You have either forgotten your stance or this is just bad journalism. Not very &#8220;enlightening&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

